Date:Tue, 18 Feb 2025 14:31:52 +0000
To:complaints&misconduct@dorset.pnn.police.uk
FOR THE ATTENTION OF THE HEAD OF COMPLAINTS & MISCONDUCT DEPARTMENT.
Dear Sir/Madam,
THIS LETTER IS IN TWO PARTS:- PART A Is my complaint about the reply I got from Inspector Kynaston dated 9 December 2024.
PART B Is asking for a Formal Recording Decision & Formal Outcom -as advised to ask for by the IOPC Plus upto date facts on DPA acts.
Part A- As your department will well know I made a Formal Complaint to your Chief Constable last year about refusals to erase files the Dorset Police (DPA) have made up on myself-even tho’ I have never committed any crimes.
You will also know that an Insector Kynaston on the 9th December 2014, sent me an email reply to that letter. Quite frankly that reply was an absolute disgrace and all in it was just a total pack of lies.They were said in order to think up excuses not to deal with the contents of my complaint to the C/C. They bore no relationship to the truth-totally made up. I am happy to sit with anyone and point out what all those lies are-with evidence.
PART B. – This subsequently made me contact the IOPC pointing out all the actions of the DPA and because after I received probono advice from a legal Data Protection lawyer, to forensically inspect each file to ascertain its legality. What I found is yet more proof of the willingness of the DPA to engage in actions against me that can be said to be ‘criminal’- making up/fabricating files-plainly in order to portray me as an individual the DPA view as worthy of constantly to be kept under surveilance and why was that.? Yet out of 46 files dating from 2001, 20 do not deal with any criminal matters I ‘may’ have committed and in fact many were completely blank- no summarries. For I have never committed any criminal acts let alone been found guilty of same. The reply by Kynaston shows how desperate the DPA are to cover up their illegal actions. For to make up files that either do not show any summaries which should show why the file has been created, statements or alleged facts that are untrue, can only have been created so as to make up a big file on me. Fabricating untrue files has to be illegal and what does that say about the DPA?? All this to be able to show that the person in the files, is a person worth keeping tabs on and this can only be said to consitute a deliberate criminal act of forgery. It is clear that someone in the DPA has at some stage decided to have files made up on me, so as to show me up in a bad light AND WHY ONLY STARTING FROM 2001?? Thus anyone in the DPA in the future who would peruse all these files on me, would get an impression on me that is totally false and would then give them the impetuous to engage in more actions against me.
This in fact has happened a number of times when DPA constables have acted in a manner that showed they had preconceived opinions about me. The worst example of this was when I was accused by a woman who had been an ex neighbour of mine, who accused me of scratching her car. (One scratch) It was a frauduent action as her car was covered in scratches and she was attempting to have it tarted up for sale. The way the DPA acted over that allegation showed me that again they had looked at what was on file, and concluded to do all they could to make those false allegations stick as a charge against me. Subsequently they never investigated the case from my perpestive and never took photos of the car & scratches and went on to believe every word of the woman and her witness told them and believed nothing I said. Then deliberately held back all the evidence documents they had in their possession, despite being asked by my lawyers several times, for them. We only got them at the court steps. Needless to say my Barrister tore the DPA, the woman and her witness to shreads. Yet the nub of all that, shows that the DPA did all this deliberately and after seeing those files on me and here was a fantastic opportunity to stitch me up. Luckily for me I got a South African Barrister instead of a soppy UK one.
The huge point here is the file on that case of car scratching is so badly written up (as is every file with a large summary) and does not show that the court threw it out-yet there it is FOR ANYONE TO SEE-showing that I committed the crime of criminal damage. Similarly there are a number of other cases in those 26 ‘Occurence Details’ files, badly written up and which actually accuse me of being at fault for an RTA and guilty of some more cases on the files. The worst one of all, the 2001 file with again-no summary but a time of 2310hrs and when I was at that time in bed with my partner at her flat which is where I was every weekend & in Christchurch. Another file with no summary but at a date when I was in NZ/Australia! All the files with a heading of ‘OCCURRENCE DETAILS’ –26 of them showing personal information on them that is untrue. Like my current address is shown in those dated 2001 to 2013 as being my address at that time, when I only moved to St Kilda in 2013!!, All 3 phones I owned have incorrect ownership dates to them, and astonishingly a car said to be owned by me has never been owned by me.
HOW CAN ANY OF THE FILES SAID TO BE BONA-FIDE WITH ALL THOSE MISTAKES I CAN SHOW -SO THEY ARE NOT BELEIVEABLE?? Thus showing that the DPA -ARE OUT TO GET ME AND STITCH ME UP FOR ANYTHING THEY CAN. OBVIOUSLY I CAN SHOW THIS TO ANY INVESTIGATOR AND WITH EVIDENCE. THEY SHOULD ALL BE ERASED SHOWING TOO MANY INCORRECT DETAILS OR WELL OUT OF DATE-SERVING NO PURPOSE & IN SOME CASES -ILLEGAL SO WHY DOES THE DPA PERSIST IN REFUSING THEIR ERASURE???? Because there is more to this than meets the eye and I think I know what is behind it all and I will only disclose this if it is properly investigated.
Subsequently under the Data Act I have asked for all these files to be erased and I shall not give up-UNTIL I DIE !!!!!!! YOU ARE NOT DEALING HERE WITH SOME EMPTY HEADED IDIOT FROM THE BOONDOCKS OR SOME COUNCIL SINK ESTATE. The Act lays out that incorrect files a files that are well out of date anyway, and can serve no possible service, can be erased. And in case you are going to try to throw at me that Stasi like document, the rediculously worded ‘Police Privacy Notice’ (which you incredably sent via an encrypted email-as if it were some State Secret), in which all of the excuses said to give the DPA rights to keep files on me, simply do not apply to all the files you have about me. It cannot be said or proved that any of what is seen in that document can be applied to myself and the DPA have never made any effort to prove they are applicable to me. All this is like living under the Stasi or in Russia and I have personal knowledge of that. I am reminded of the time about 2013 when I took the DPA to court myself for refusing to admit or deny that they held files on me. I got then, Pro- bono advice from a QC who told the court and your snivelling Barrister who was obviously an old mate of the Judge, that files can only be kept on a person if they are to do with criminal matters. Yet out of the 46 files only 6 can remotely be about anything criminal, involving myself and they were all -where I ‘WAS THE VICTIM’ and are out of date now and in any case I was never found guilty on 1 of them (car scratching case) So they can serve no purpose to be on file anymore. Hence my legal request to have them erased and what possible purpose can they be when I am 84 and in bad health, so how long have I got anyway? Plus I have lived an impeccable life – over 30 years abroad and 8 years in the RAF and in the Police – twice on active service- my Father an Inspector in the Colonial Police in Palestine (I was born there) and in Somalia, his Father and brother both in the Liverpool Police, and yet here I am in this situation after a blameless life, having to put up with what we in the UK now have to put up with all our useless halfwit so called police, doing things like this.
THE IOPC HAVE SAID I SHOULD ASK FOR ‘FORMAL RECORDING DECISION’ AND ‘A FORMAL OUTCOME’
THIS IS A MATTER OF PRINCIPAL-SOMETHING THAT IS BEYOND THE BRITISH POLICE TO UNDERSTAND AND COMPREHEND AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS DEALT WITH IN WEEKS AND NOT MONTHS.
K Cook,